Madness, Reason, and Pride

[...]the boon of instead pursuing questions of an ‘opposed to what?’ sort; hence Wittgenstein considering using the Earl of Kent’s “I’ll teach you differences” (King Lear) as a motto for his Investigations. [...]much of what else the delusional subject says, even regarding that which also features a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhilosophy, psychiatry & psychology Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 307 - 311
Main Author Gipps, Richard G.T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press 01.12.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[...]the boon of instead pursuing questions of an ‘opposed to what?’ sort; hence Wittgenstein considering using the Earl of Kent’s “I’ll teach you differences” (King Lear) as a motto for his Investigations. [...]much of what else the delusional subject says, even regarding that which also features as the topic of their delusion, expresses rationally intelligible thought: Resolving the paradox is to involve us in acknowledging that: “the mad person has an intact inferential capacity,” but reasons from faulty premises because of an “unhinged power of association” (Locke); in madness “reason’s systematizing quality” is retained (Kant); the mad person has “two minds, one of which is reasonable and the other unreasonable” (Wigan); and the mad person is “pragmatically rational” in that they have “a fundamentally reasonable goal, that of protecting themselves from a painful world” (Heinroth). Put a car up on bricks, start the engine, put it in gear, and depress the accelerator:
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1071-6076
1086-3303
1086-3303
DOI:10.1353/ppp.2023.a916212