Randomised studies in general practice: how to integrate the electronic patient record

The 'randomised database study' strategy was first proposed in 1997, with the aim of combining the generalisability of observational database studies based on electronic patient records (EPRs) with the validity of randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The key feature was to randomly assign tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInformatics in primary care Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 209 - 213
Main Authors Mosis, Georgio, Koes, Bart, Dieleman, Jeanne, Stricker, Bruno Ch, van der Lei, Johan, Sturkenboom, Miriam C J M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The 'randomised database study' strategy was first proposed in 1997, with the aim of combining the generalisability of observational database studies based on electronic patient records (EPRs) with the validity of randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The key feature was to randomly assign treatments and to use routine care data, as available in the observational database, for patient identification and follow-up. To our knowledge, however, the idea of the randomised database study has not been implemented yet. The conduct of a randomised study in an observational database requires adjustments to methods of medical information processing in the general practice. We developed a software system that facilitates the conduct of an RCT with observational databases based on EPRs. It identifies eligible subjects and presents them one by one to the physician once their EPR is accessed. The general practitioner can then start an interactive recruitment process; after completion, the computer randomises the patients. Follow-up is documented by normal routine care in the EPR. Although the randomised database study has many methodological advantages, it has never been tested. Our software system is meant as a tool to implement and facilitate evaluation of the randomised database approach.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1476-0320
2058-4555
2058-4563
DOI:10.14236/jhi.v13i3.599