Renal Risk of Contrast-Enhanced Imaging – Is It a Myth? The Latest Opinions of the Guidelines

Over the last decade, several divergent views have been expressed regarding the effect that iodinated contrast agents may have on renal function. Evidence-based medicine often requires the recommendation of high-performance contrast-enhanced imaging exams for precise positive diagnosis. The fear of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedicina modernă (Bucharest, Romania) Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 87 - 90
Main Authors RADULESCU, Daniela, DAVID, Cristiana, VACAROIU, Ileana Adela
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Media Med Publicis 26.06.2020
Subjects
contrast agent
contrast-induced aki
hydration
nephrotoxic
prophylaxis
risk
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Over the last decade, several divergent views have been expressed regarding the effect that iodinated contrast agents may have on renal function. Evidence-based medicine often requires the recommendation of high-performance contrast-enhanced imaging exams for precise positive diagnosis. The fear of intravenous contrast use in patients with elevated serum creatinine seems to become an old dogma, outdated by the benefits of the procedures. Patients with glomerular filtration rate below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 can be protected by peri-procedural hydration and withdrawal of other nephrotoxics. Whatever the degree of risk, current guidelines recommend contrast-enhanced investigations in any situations where the advantages for the diagnosis are certain.
ISSN:1223-0472
2360-2473
DOI:10.31689/rmm.2020.27.2.87