The Ghost of Wittgenstein Forms of Life, Scientific Method, and Cultural Critique

• Published in: Philosophy of the social sciences Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 139 - 174
• Main Author: Lynch, William T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01.06.2005; Sage; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Cultural studies; Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge; Ethnomethodology; Knowledge; Methodology (Philosophical); Philosophy; Research methods; Science history; Scientific Method; Social sciences; Sociology; Sociology of Science; Wittgenstein, Ludwig; Wittgenstein, Ludwig Joseph Johann; sociology of scientific knowledge; ethnomethodology; scientific method; interpretive sociology; Wittgenstein; Sociology; Epistemology;Philosophy of Science; Science philosophy; Wittgenstein (L.); Criticism; Politics; Scientific knowledge
• ISSN: 0048-3931; 1552-7441
• DOI: 10.1177/0048393105275280

In developing an “internal” sociology of science, the sociology of scientific knowledge drew on Wittgenstein’s later philosophy to reinterpret traditional epistemological topics in sociological terms. By construing scientific reasoning as rule following within a collective, sociologists David Bloor and Harry Collins effectively blocked outside criticism of a scientific field, whether scientific, philosophical, or political. Ethnomethodologist Michael Lynch developed an alternative, Wittgensteinian reading that similarly blocked philosophical or political critique, while also disallowing analytical appeals to historical or institutional contexts. I criticize these Wittgensteinian sociologies and argue for the historical and contemporary significance of methodological criticisms of scientific practice that conjoin epistemological and political categories. I consider two such cases briefly: the Baconian criticism of Scholastic science in the early Royal Society and the criticism of AIDS drug testing protocols by activists.