Comparison of commercial silicon-based anode materials for the design of a high-energy lithium-ion battery

Silicon (Si) is considered a potential alternative anode for next-generation Li-ion batteries owing to its high theoretical capacity and abundance. However, the commercial use of Si anodes is hindered by their large volume expansion (∼ 300%). Numerous efforts have been made to address this issue. Am...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNano research Vol. 17; no. 6; pp. 5270 - 5277
Main Authors Choi, Minhong, Lee, Eunhan, Sung, Jaekyung, Kim, Namhyung, Ko, Minseong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Beijing Tsinghua University Press 01.06.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Silicon (Si) is considered a potential alternative anode for next-generation Li-ion batteries owing to its high theoretical capacity and abundance. However, the commercial use of Si anodes is hindered by their large volume expansion (∼ 300%). Numerous efforts have been made to address this issue. Among these efforts, Si-graphite co-utilization has attracted attention as a reasonable alternative for high-energy anodes. A comparative study of representative commercial Si-based materials, such as Si nanoparticles, Si suboxides, and Si–Graphite composites (SiGC), was conducted to characterize their overall performance in high-energy lithium-ion battery (LIB) design by incorporating conventional graphite. Nano-Si was found to exhibit poor electrochemical performance, with severe volume expansion during cycling. Si suboxide provided excellent cycling stability in a full-cell evaluation with stable volume variation after 50 cycles, but had a large irreversible capacity and remarkable volume expansion during the first cycle. SiGC displayed a good initial Coulombic efficiency and the lowest volume change in the first cycle owing to the uniformly distributed nano-Si layer on graphite; however, its long-term cycling stability was relatively poor. To complement each disadvantage of Si suboxide and SiGC, a new combination of these Si-based anodes was suggested and a reasonable improvement in overall battery performance was successfully achieved.
ISSN:1998-0124
1998-0000
DOI:10.1007/s12274-024-6512-x