The effect of the choice of method for determining assigned value on the assessment of performance in melting point analysis

• Published in: Accreditation and quality assurance Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 413 - 417
• Main Authors: Whetton, M., Baryla, K., Finch, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.08.2012; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acids; Analytical Chemistry; Bias; Biochemistry; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Commercial Law; Ecotoxicology; Food Science; Marketing; Melting points; Methods; Performance assessment; Pharmaceutical industry; Practitioner's Report; Purity; Reference materials; Standard deviation; PHARMASSURE; Method bias; Melting point; Proficiency testing
• ISSN: 0949-1775; 1432-0517
• DOI: 10.1007/s00769-012-0908-0

The determination of melting point is a fundamental test in the Pharmaceutical industry, since it is one of the simplest techniques for the identification of a chemical substance. The melting point provides information on both identity and purity of a chemical substance and for that reason is a key test in the PHARMASSURE proficiency testing (PT) scheme. The PT scheme assesses participant’s determination of melting point, using chemicals of high purity and basing the assigned value on the robust consensus mean (median). In recent rounds, melting point reference standards have been provided as the test material and a reference value used as the assigned value for PT assessment. Comparison of the PT results over a number of rounds, using test materials with a wide range of melting points, shows the overall performance of the participant group is worse in rounds where a reference material and associated reference assigned value are used for performance assessment. When participants were assessed against the reference assigned value, a positive bias was observed in the participant’s results. Detailed information regarding the methodology used demonstrated that the majority of participants use the same analytical method, EU.Ph.2.2.14 (Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2011 ), for the determination of melting point although this procedure allows flexibility in key methodological parameters, such as heating ramp rate, which may fail to ensure consistent performance across the group of participant laboratories.