Comparative Immunofluorescent Analysis of Estrogen Receptor Beta Expression in Ovarian and Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Comparative quantitative evaluation of estrogen receptors β (ERβ) expression is performed by the immunofluorescence method using flow cytometry in the ovarian cancer cell lines COLO-704, OVCAR-3, EFO-21, and SK-OV-3, as well as the breast cancer cell line MCF-7. A high level of ERβ expression (88–91...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMoscow University chemistry bulletin Vol. 75; no. 5; pp. 274 - 279
Main Authors Bogush, T. A., Basharina, A. A., Burova, O. S., Bogush, E. A., Kirsanov, V. Yu, Scherbakov, A. M., Syuvatkin, V. A., Ryabinina, O. M., Baryshnikova, M. A., Kosorukov, V. S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Moscow Pleiades Publishing 01.09.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Comparative quantitative evaluation of estrogen receptors β (ERβ) expression is performed by the immunofluorescence method using flow cytometry in the ovarian cancer cell lines COLO-704, OVCAR-3, EFO-21, and SK-OV-3, as well as the breast cancer cell line MCF-7. A high level of ERβ expression (88–91%) is revealed in all the cell cultures investigated, and significant differences were observed in the intensity of the marker’s expression between ovarian cancer cell cultures (in OVCAR-3, EFO-21, and SK-OV-3 they are higher than in COLO-704 cells by factors of 1.6, 2.3, and 3.5, respectively). Moreover, the intensity of ERβ expression was significantly higher in SK-OV-3, EFO-21, and OVCAR-3 than in MCF-7 cells: in 2.7; 1.4 and 1.9 times, respectively. The authors suggest that in contrast to breast cancer patients, ERβ rather than ERα could be the main target for antiestrogens in ovarian cancer patients. The revealed differences in the ERβ expression in a number of widely used ovarian cancer cell cultures lead us to recommend them for further fundamental research on ERβ to study the biological effects of antiestrogens.
ISSN:0027-1314
1935-0260
DOI:10.3103/S0027131420050028