Case–control comparison of bacterial and protozoan microorganisms associated with gastroenteritis: application of molecular detection

• Published in: Clinical microbiology and infection Vol. 21; no. 6; pp. 592.e9 - 592.e19
• Main Authors: Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, L.E.S., Dullaert-de Boer, M., Ruijs, G.J.H.M., van der Reijden, W.A., van der Zanden, A.G.M., Weel, J.F. L., Schuurs, T.A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2015
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Bacteria - classification; Bacteria - isolation & purification; Bacterial Infections - epidemiology; Bacterial Infections - microbiology; Case-Control Studies; Case–control; Child; Child, Preschool; diarrhea; Feces - microbiology; Feces - parasitology; Female; gastroenteritis; Gastroenteritis - epidemiology; Gastroenteritis - microbiology; Gastroenteritis - parasitology; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction; multiplexed real-time PCR; Netherlands - epidemiology; Parasites - classification; Parasites - isolation & purification; pathogen load; Protozoan Infections - epidemiology; Protozoan Infections - parasitology; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Young Adult; Netherlands; multiplexed real-time PCR; gastroenteritis; diarrhea; pathogen load; Case–control
• ISSN: 1198-743X; 1469-0691; 1469-0691
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.007

The introduction of molecular detection of infectious organisms has led to increased numbers of positive findings, as observed for pathogens causing gastroenteritis (GE). However, because little is known about the prevalence of these pathogens in the healthy asymptomatic population, the clinical value of these additional findings is unclear. A case–control study was carried out in a population of patients served by general practitioners in the Netherlands. A total of 2710 fecal samples from case and matched control subjects were subjected to multiplex real-time PCR for the 11 most common bacterial and four protozoal causes of GE. Of 1515 case samples, 818 (54%) were positive for one or more target organisms. A total of 49% of the controls were positive. Higher positivity rates in cases compared to controls were observed for Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Clostridium difficile, enteroinvasive Escherichia coli/Shigella spp., enterotoxigenic E. coli, enteroaggregative E. coli, atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Cryptosporidium parvum/hominis, and Giardia lamblia. However, Dientamoeba fragilis and Shiga-like toxigenic E. coli were detected significantly less frequent in cases than in controls, while no difference in prevalence was found for typical EPEC and enterohemorrhagic E. coli. The association between the presence of microorganisms and GE was the weakest in children aged 0 to 5 years. Higher relative loads in cases further support causality. This was seen for Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., enterotoxigenic E. coli, and C. parvum/hominis, and for certain age categories of those infected with C. difficile, enteroaggregative E. coli, and atypical EPEC. For D. fragilis and Shiga-like toxigenic E. coli/enterohemorrhagic E. coli, pathogen loads were lower in cases. Application of molecular diagnostics in GE is rapid, sensitive and specific, but results should be interpreted with care, using clinical and additional background information.