The Pros and Cons of Circular RNAs as miRNA Sponges

The roles that noncoding RNAs play in various cells have been a focus of intense research in recent years. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are noncoding RNAs that were initially thought to be junk by-products of splicing. Many circRNAs have been found to demonstrate important regulatory functions and, in p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiophysics (Oxford) Vol. 66; no. 1; pp. 8 - 16
Main Authors Duk, M. A., Samsonova, M. G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Moscow Pleiades Publishing 2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Binding sites
Biological and Medical Physics
Biophysics
miRNA
Molecular Biophysics
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
noise
miRNA sponge
miRNA
noncoding RNA
circular RNAs
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The roles that noncoding RNAs play in various cells have been a focus of intense research in recent years. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are noncoding RNAs that were initially thought to be junk by-products of splicing. Many circRNAs have been found to demonstrate important regulatory functions and, in particular, to act as miRNA sponges. The function of an miRNA sponge was compared with the function of a classic transcription factor (TF)-dependent regulatory loop in terms of efficiency, working rate, and noise characteristics. A circRNA with multiple binding sites for miRNA was found to act more efficiently than a TF and the respective loop worked faster, but only when the binding sites were not fully saturated with miRNA molecules. The noise characteristics of the circRNA loop were significantly worse with an increasing number of binding sites. A circRNA with one binding site was shown to be inefficient as an miRNA sponge. The circRNA-mediated regulation was assumed to provide a specific tool to the cell.
ISSN:0006-3509
1555-6654
DOI:10.1134/S0006350921010036