Comparison of QT/RR Relationship Using Two Algorithms of QT Interval Analysis for Identification of High Risk Patients for Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dynamic relationship between QT and RR intervals considering either the QTe interval (i.e., time between the onset of QRS and the end of the T wave) or the QTa interval (i.e., time between the onset of QRS and the apex of the T wave) from 30‐s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 3 - 8
Main Authors Kiuge, Petra, Walter, Thomas, Neugebauer, Annerose
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1082-720X
1542-474X
DOI10.1111/j.1542-474X.1997.tb00303.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dynamic relationship between QT and RR intervals considering either the QTe interval (i.e., time between the onset of QRS and the end of the T wave) or the QTa interval (i.e., time between the onset of QRS and the apex of the T wave) from 30‐second modules. Method: The Holter recordings in three groups of adult subjects (30 patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias [VT/VF patients], 40 patients with coronary artery disease [CAD], and 44 normal subjects) were analyzed using the ELATEC System. Results: In normal subjects the correlation coefficient between QTa and RR (QTa/RR) was significantly higher (0.87 ± 0.12) than those between QTe and RR (QTe/RR) (0.79 ± 0.17). In the other groups there was no significant difference between QTa/RR and QTe/RR: QTa/RR (CAD: 0.71 ± 0.3; VT/VF: 0.73 ± 0.19); and QTe/RR (CAD: 0.63 ± 0.33; VT/VF: 0.69 ± 0.21). The slope of QTe/ RR over 24 hours was significantly larger in VT/VF patients (0.23 ± 0.11) than in the other groups (control: 0.18 ± 0.08; CAD: 0.17 ± 0.1). Measuring the QTa/RR relation there was no difference between the three groups (VT/VF: 0.19 ± 0.09; CAD: 0.15 ± 0.09; normal: 0.19 ± 0.06). Conclusion: QTe/RR as well as QTa/RR analyses are methods of detecting a deranged rate dependence of QT intervals in high risk patients. An increased QTe/RR slope indicates a higher risk of life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Because there was no difference in QTa/RR we conclude that the end of the T wave gives important information about disorders in repolarization.
Bibliography:istex:9551803F9264372F9F54EB771775A9F9E45275B9
ArticleID:ANEC3
ark:/67375/WNG-74QTZBJP-G
ISSN:1082-720X
1542-474X
DOI:10.1111/j.1542-474X.1997.tb00303.x