Psychometric Properties of the Persian Kessler Psychological Distress Scale Among Iranian Older Adults

• Published in: Iranian journal of health sciences Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 21 - 28
• Main Authors: Lotfalinezhad, Elham, Barati, Fatemeh, Sahaf, Robab, Shati, Mohsen, Abolfathi Momtaz, Yadollah, Forughan, Mahshid, Amini, Fatemeh, Bhalla, Devender, Papi, Shahab, Hosseinnataj, Abolfazl
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 01.12.2023
• Subjects: elderly; mental health; psychological distress
• ISSN: 2322-553X; 2322-4797
• DOI: 10.32598/ijhs.11.1.909.2

Background and Purpose: We measured the psychometric properties i.e., validity, reliability, and stability of the Persian 10-item Kessler psychological distress scale (K10) among older adults in Iran. Materials and Methods: We recruited elderly (60+ years) subjects (20 per item of the questionnaire) from various sampling units in the general population of Gorgan district, Golestan, Iran. After the translation/back-translation process, the questionnaire underwent various forms of validity and reliability, including Cronbach alpha (overall, by items, and by group of yes to an item and no to an item). The intra-class correlation coefficient was measured at a two-week interval, and inter-rater agreement was also determined. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted, along with receiver-operator characteristics vis-à-vis hospital anxiety and depression scale. Results: In total, 190 subjects (47.3% males, mean age: 70.3, 95% CI: 69.2-71.4) participated in the study. A total of 35.8% had psychological distress (PD) (i.e., score >20). The alpha coefficient was 0.88 with no item below 0.86. The alpha coefficients to report a yes to an item (α=0.85) or no to an item (α=0.90) were similar to each other. The intra-class coefficient for test-retest at a two-week interval was 0.90. Exploratory factor analysis showed a one-factor structure of the underlying construct, with a cumulative variance of 97.1%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed high fit indices for the questionnaire (0.91) and a low standardized residual of 0.05.