Farmers’ motivations to cultivate biomass for energy and implications

• Published in: Energy policy Vol. 193; p. 114295
• Main Authors: Thomson Ek, Hedda, Singh, Jagdeep, Winberg, Josefin, Brady, Mark V., Clough, Yann
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2024
• Subjects: Agricultural bioenergy; Farmers; Förnyelsebar bioenergi; Land use change; Policy implications; Renewable Bioenergy Research; Underutilized lands; Agricultural bioenergy; Farmers; Underutilized lands; Land use change; Policy implications
• ISSN: 0301-4215; 1873-6777
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114295

Bioenergy derived from agricultural biomass can contribute to meeting the rising demand for renewable energy. To estimate the agricultural sector's potential to contribute to bioenergy, it is crucial to understand what motivates farmers to increase agricultural feedstock production sustainably. Through eight semi-structured interviews and online surveys with 174 farmers in southern Sweden, we explore the barriers and incentives farmers perceive in starting or increasing feedstock production for energy purposes sustainably using production methods with a low risk of causing indirect land use change (iLUC). Among the most prominent barriers are low profitability, high-risk investments, and potential negative environmental consequences such as soil depletion. Higher market prices for plant residuals and energy crops, combined with more long-term and reliable subsidies that support investments in new machinery, facilities, and production systems, are major driving factors to increase feedstock production for bioenergy. The study found that the farmers see little potential in using marginal lands due to their low soil productivity and spatial characteristics. Further, the potential for intensifying biomass production on currently cropped land is also found to be limited due to risks of soil depletion and environmental degradation. Our study highlights that the potential of bioenergy production from underutilized land and intensive production in Scania may be overestimated, and realizing this potential in practice may require suitable policy changes. •Low iLUC-risk agricultural production methods can contribute to energy production.•There is high interest among farmers in intermediate crops and agricultural residuals for energy.•Low demand for biomass lowers interest in producing it.•Farmers prioritize market prices over subsidies.•Enhanced conditionality for Common Agricultural Policy payments could be used to increase biomass production.