Improved Determination of n-Alkanes by Forming of Urea Inclusion Compounds

This report describes the trace analytical method of n-alkanes, based on the inclusion ability of urea, from a mixture of iso-alkanes, cycloalkanes, poly aromatic hydrocarbons and organic sulfur compounds. n-Alkane-urea inclusion complexes were formed by adding ethanol 2 ml of saturated with urea to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEisei kagaku Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 118 - 128
Main Authors MATSUNAGA, KAZUYOSHI, IMANAKA, MASAAKI, KENMOTSU, KATASHI, HINO, SEIJI
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
English
Published The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan 1987
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This report describes the trace analytical method of n-alkanes, based on the inclusion ability of urea, from a mixture of iso-alkanes, cycloalkanes, poly aromatic hydrocarbons and organic sulfur compounds. n-Alkane-urea inclusion complexes were formed by adding ethanol 2 ml of saturated with urea to 0.5 ml of a mixed solution of acetone and n-hexane (3 : 2) containing the above described compounds. The inclusion compounds formed in the hydrophobic medium were precipitated by adding ice-cold ethyl ether and then cooling for 5-10 min in an ice-bath. The precipitates were separated with centrifuge (3000 rpm, 6 min) at 5°C from organic reaction medium. The precipitates were dissolved in 30 ml of 4% Na2SO4 and extracted with n-hexane (total volume, 20 ml), and also the supernatant by the addition of 30 ml of 4% Na2SO4 was treated with n-hexane (20 ml). n-Alkanes were measured in the former n-hexane solution while iso-alkanes and/or others in the latter by each gas chromato-graphic analysis. The recoveries of n-alkanes of C12 and C14 were 67% and 80%, respectively, being recoverd in the past reports with yield of under 40%. The yields of n-alkanes of C15-C28, 2, 2, 4, 4, 6, 8, 8-heptamethylnonane, heptylbenzene, pristane, dibenzothiophene and 3, 4-benzpyrene were 91% on the average, 77%, 79%, 80%, 83% and 84%, respectively. This analytical method was applied to the solvent extracts of a bait of cultured fish and the sea bottom sediment.
ISSN:0013-273X
DOI:10.1248/jhs1956.33.118