Recognition of jagged (pixelated) letters in the periphery
Previous studies found that for a group of mixed low vision observers, letter counting with smooth (anti-aliased) letters was better than with jagged (pixelated) letters on a CRT display (Bailey et al., Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:678-685). However,using a tachistoscopic presentation, Geiger and...
Saved in:
Published in | Visual impairment research Vol. 2; no. 3; pp. 143 - 154 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Informa UK Ltd
2000
Taylor & Francis |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Previous studies found that for a group of mixed low vision observers, letter counting with smooth (anti-aliased) letters was better than with jagged (pixelated) letters on a CRT display (Bailey et al., Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:678-685). However,using a tachistoscopic presentation, Geiger and Lettvin (Perception 1998;27(Suppl.):15) found that for normally sighted observers, recognition of jagged letters was more accurate than that of smooth letters in the periphery. In the present study,we further investigated this effect using a high-resolution CRT display. Our results indicate that for normally sighted observers, recognition of jagged letters is not different from that of smooth letters in the periphery. This suggests that letter smoothing on a CRT display might not benefit reading of low vision patients with central field loss. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1388-235X 1744-5167 |
DOI: | 10.1076/vimr.2.3.143.4421 |