Recognition of jagged (pixelated) letters in the periphery

Previous studies found that for a group of mixed low vision observers, letter counting with smooth (anti-aliased) letters was better than with jagged (pixelated) letters on a CRT display (Bailey et al., Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:678-685). However,using a tachistoscopic presentation, Geiger and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVisual impairment research Vol. 2; no. 3; pp. 143 - 154
Main Authors Li, Li, Nugent, Alex K., Peli, Eli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Informa UK Ltd 2000
Taylor & Francis
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies found that for a group of mixed low vision observers, letter counting with smooth (anti-aliased) letters was better than with jagged (pixelated) letters on a CRT display (Bailey et al., Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:678-685). However,using a tachistoscopic presentation, Geiger and Lettvin (Perception 1998;27(Suppl.):15) found that for normally sighted observers, recognition of jagged letters was more accurate than that of smooth letters in the periphery. In the present study,we further investigated this effect using a high-resolution CRT display. Our results indicate that for normally sighted observers, recognition of jagged letters is not different from that of smooth letters in the periphery. This suggests that letter smoothing on a CRT display might not benefit reading of low vision patients with central field loss.
ISSN:1388-235X
1744-5167
DOI:10.1076/vimr.2.3.143.4421