Quantitative growth fraction evaluation with MIB1 and Ki67 antibodies in breast carcinomas

• Published in: American journal of clinical pathology Vol. 102; no. 2; pp. 171 - 175
• Main Authors: BARBARESCHI, M, GIRLANDO, S, MAURI, F. M, FORTI, S, ECCHER, C, MAURI, F. A, TOGNI, R, DALLA PALMA, P, DOGLIONI, C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chicago, IL American Society of Clinical Pathologists 01.08.1994
• Subjects: Adenocarcinoma - immunology; Adenocarcinoma - pathology; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Biological and medical sciences; Breast Neoplasms - immunology; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology; Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology; Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology; Cell Cycle; Female; Frozen Sections; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Immunohistochemistry; Ki-67 Antigen; Mammary gland diseases; Medical sciences; Neoplasm Proteins - immunology; Nuclear Proteins - immunology; Paraffin Embedding; Tumors; Adenocarcinoma; Human; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis; Histological inclusion; Malignant tumor; Paraffin; Mammary gland diseases; Pathology; Image analysis; Cryosection; Mammary gland; Comparative study; Quantitative analysis
• ISSN: 0002-9173; 1943-7722
• DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/102.2.171

Ki67 and MIB1 monoclonal antibodies are directed against different epitopes of the same proliferation-related antigen. Whereas Ki67 works only on frozen sections, MIB1 may be used also on fixed sections. The authors immunostained a series of 40 breast carcinomas with MIB1 and Ki67 antibodies on serial frozen sections and on fixed material. The Ki67 labeling index (LI) was 12.9 +/- 8.9 and 12 (mean +/- SD and median, respectively). MIB1 LI was 21.2 +/- 11.9 and 19.5 on frozen sections and 24 +/- 15.2 and 21.5 on fixed sections (mean +/- SD and median, respectively). Ki67 LI and MIB1 LI on frozen and fixed sections were strictly correlated (P < .001). The results are in keeping with the reported coincidental nuclear staining pattern of Ki67 and MIB1, but the mean and median values of MIB1 LI are almost twice the values of Ki67 LI. The cut-off values to define high and low proliferative activity with the two antibodies are therefore different. The differences in immunolabeling may be due to better survival of the MIB1 epitope in freezing and acetone fixation or to differing accessibilities of the MIB1 and Ki67 epitopes during the cell cycle due to molecular conformational modifications. The MIB1 monoclonal antibody is a reasonable substitute for the Ki67 monoclonal antibody. The advantages of MIB1 immunostaining on paraffin sections include the feasibility of retrospective studies and of obtaining clear morphologic specimens that are optimal for use with computer-assisted image analysis systems. Our image-processing system allows automatic nuclear counting, detects positive nuclei and measures their staining intensity.