Behavior of monolithic and composite shields under space debris impact
Designing space structures for long-duration missions requires accounting for the impact of space debris. This involves assessing lightweight, high-strength composite shields, commonly used in aerospace applications, for their response to hypervelocity impacts. The available research on this subject...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of mechanics, A, Solids Vol. 111; p. 105558 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Masson SAS
01.05.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Designing space structures for long-duration missions requires accounting for the impact of space debris. This involves assessing lightweight, high-strength composite shields, commonly used in aerospace applications, for their response to hypervelocity impacts. The available research on this subject mostly focuses on determining the size of space debris such as spheres, cylinders, disks, and rings which must be resisted by the shields. However, there have been fewer studies on ellipsoidal debris. Predicting the average residual velocity of space debris and determining a ballistic limit of shields are important for ensuring structural safety against space debris impact. This study investigates the ballistic performance of Al-2024-T3 aluminum alloy, nylon 66 polymer (NY66), nylon 66 fiber (NYF66), and their composite shields under hypervelocity impacts with ellipsoidal debris. The shape factor (SF), based on the length-to-diameter (L/d) ratio, categorizes the ellipsoidal debris. The Johnson-Cook model for Al-2024-T3 and the Elastic-Plastic Hydro model for NY66 and NYF66 were calibrated and the simulations performed on LS-DYNA code validated with experimental results. Modified equations for ballistic limit and residual velocity were derived from computational results. Among the materials, NYF66 showed superior ballistic resistance. Composite Type-A was optimal for hypervelocity impacts, while Type-C1 excelled in high-velocity impacts.
•The material parameters for Al-2024-T3 and NY66 have been calibrated and validated.•The computational model is validated via the experimental results with comprehensive error analysis being performed.•The ballistic performance of monolithic, composite, and Whipple shields is predicted.•The equations for the ballistic limit and the average residual velocity have been modified and derived for the case of ellipsoidal space debris impact.•NYF66 demonstrated exceptional ballistic performance under hypervelocity impact. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0997-7538 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105558 |