Comparing the effect of tissue adhesive and suturing material on collagen I/III ratio in abdominal skin wounds: an experimental study
Background: The skin closure procedure should be technically simple, acceptable, quick, and cost-effective. Sutures remain the technique’s mainstay, however tissue adhesive is becoming more used in clinical practice. Collagen ratios of types I and III play a significant role as postoperative wound h...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of medicine and surgery Vol. 85; no. 11; pp. 5450 - 5453 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hagerstown, MD
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
01.11.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
The skin closure procedure should be technically simple, acceptable, quick, and cost-effective. Sutures remain the technique’s mainstay, however tissue adhesive is becoming more used in clinical practice. Collagen ratios of types I and III play a significant role as postoperative wound healing parameters. Here, the authors aim to examine the collagen I/III ratio of tissue adhesive vs. non-absorbable sutures for abdominal skin closure in Wistar albino rats.
Material and methods:
The authors allocated 20 rats into four experimental groups. Wounds in groups 1 and 3 were sealed with tissue adhesive (cyanoacrylate), while those in groups 2 and 4 were closed using suture material (monofilament non-absorbable nylon). Groups 1 and 2 were sacrificed on postoperative day (POD) 4, while those in groups 3 and 4 were euthanized on POD 7. Skin samples (1×0.5 cm) were collected for analysis, and the collagen I/III ratios were determined using immunohistochemistry staining techniques.
Results:
The levels of collagen I and III expression did not exhibit statistically significant differences between tissue adhesive and nylon suture groups at either POD 4 (
P
=0.052,
P
=0.513) or POD 7 (
P
=0.125,
P
=0.80). Similarly, the collagen I/III ratio did not significantly differ between the two groups at POD 4 (1.23±2.26 vs. 0.70±0.24;
P
=0.47) or POD 7 (0.68±0.96 vs. 0.77±1.22;
P
=0.857).
Conclusions:
There were no statistical significance difference in collagen I/III ratio between the tissue adhesive and suture material groups, suggesting that the choice of wound closure material may not influence the abdominal skin closure. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2049-0801 2049-0801 |
DOI: | 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001206 |