Who Makes Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Who Have No Surrogate or Advance Directive?
Unrepresented patients are those who have no surrogate or advance directive to guide medical decision making for them when they become incapacitated. While there is no perfect solution to the problem of making medical decisions for such vulnerable patients, 3 different approaches are noted in the li...
Saved in:
| Published in | AMA journal of ethics Vol. 21; no. 7; p. E587 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
01.07.2019
|
| Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | Unrepresented patients are those who have no surrogate or advance directive to guide medical decision making for them when they become incapacitated. While there is no perfect solution to the problem of making medical decisions for such vulnerable patients, 3 different approaches are noted in the literature: a physician approach, an ethics committee approach, and a guardianship approach. Recent policies and laws have required an approach that is "tiered" with respect to both who is involved and the gravity of the medical treatment questions at issue. In a general sense, some variant of a tiered approach is likely the best possible solution for jurisdictions and health institutions-both those already with and those without a tiered approach-to the challenging puzzle of treating unrepresented patients. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2376-6980 |
| DOI: | 10.1001/amajethics.2019.587 |