Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two formulations of mifepristone tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions: a single-center, open, randomized, single-dose, double-period, two-sequence, crossover trial

A bioequivalence (BE) study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and bioequivalence of two formulations of mifepristone tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting conditions. A single-center, open, randomized, single-dose, double-period, two-sequence, crossover study in h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in pharmacology Vol. 15; p. 1479205
Main Authors Yan, Yufeng, Zhu, Xiaoshan, Dong, Ping, Liu, Cheng, Lu, Lingqing, Zeng, Liyan, Chen, Guiying, Meng, Xianmin, Liu, Min
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 16.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A bioequivalence (BE) study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and bioequivalence of two formulations of mifepristone tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting conditions. A single-center, open, randomized, single-dose, double-period, two-sequence, crossover study in healthy subjects under fasting conditions was performed. The subjects received a single fasting dose of mifepristone (10 mg/tablet) during the first and second periods, followed by a 14-day washout period, during which frequent pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling occurred up to 120 h. The pharmacokinetic parameters of mifepristone were calculated based on the plasma drug concentration-time profile. Primary endpoints were the BE of major pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC and AUC ) and the maximum observed serum concentration (C ). Secondary endpoints were safety parameters. Forty subjects (34 male and 6 female subjects) were randomly assigned to treatment, with 39 completing the two-period study. After the single administration of mifepristone tablets (test preparation vs. reference preparation) under fasting conditions, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C , AUC , and AUC were 98.76%, 104.28%, and 104.83%, respectively. The primary metabolites of mifepristone (RU42633 and RU42698),the GMRs of C , AUC , AUC were 102.33% and 100.97%, 103.17% and 103.71%, 104.02% and 103.84%, respectively. Similarly, for another metabolite of mifepristone (RU42698), the GMRs of C , AUC , and AUC were 100.97%, 103.71%, and 103.84%, respectively. All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the test/reference AUC ratio and C ratio were within the acceptable range (80%-125%) for BE, which met the requirements of bioequivalence. No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred, and all AEs were classified as level 1 or 2. The PK parameters of mifepristone and its metabolites (RU42633 and RU42698) were measured using the (GMRs) of AUC , AUC , and C and were similar between the test and reference drug. The two formulations of mifepristone showed good tolerability and a similar safety profile. chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20182413.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Catherine M. T. Sherwin, University of Western Australia, Australia
Edited by: Karel Allegaert, KU Leuven, Belgium
Haimiao Yang, The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1479205