How Free Market Logic Fails in Schooling—And What It Means for the Role of Government

Market-based policies, especially school vouchers, are expanding rapidly and shifting students out of traditional public schools. This article broadens, deepens, and updates prior critiques of the free market logic in five ways. First, although prior articles have pointed to some of the conditions n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducational Researcher Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 111 - 122
Main Author Harris, Douglas N.
Format Book Review Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2024
American Educational Research Association
Subjects
Education policy
Educational Policy
Educational Vouchers
Efficient markets
Free Enterprise System
Free markets
Government Role
Literature Reviews
Logical Thinking
Vouchers
educational reform
educational policy
econometric analysis
policy
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Market-based policies, especially school vouchers, are expanding rapidly and shifting students out of traditional public schools. This article broadens, deepens, and updates prior critiques of the free market logic in five ways. First, although prior articles have pointed to some of the conditions necessary for efficient market functioning, I provide a more comprehensive list. Second, with an up-to-date literature review, I show that all of these conditions fail to hold to an unusual extent in schooling relative to other markets. Third, because of these failures, I argue that the most potent critique of the free market approach to schooling comes from the intellectual home of markets—economics. Fourth, I show that the issues leading to inefficiency are the same ones leading to inequity. Fifth, I argue that the analysis points to specific roles for government that go well beyond those included in new universal school voucher policies but are also narrower than the roles of government encompassed in traditional public education. For these reasons, the current policy direction is off track and apparently inconsistent with the main criteria on which we evaluate education policy and even with the values that voucher advocates profess.
ISSN:0013-189X
1935-102X
DOI:10.3102/0013189X231216953