Beyond the Positivism/Non-Positivism Binary as a Step Toward Inclusive Sociology

• Published in: Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 405 - 419
• Main Authors: Headley, Vernon, Jones, Annie, Carter, Shannon K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.07.2024; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Capitalism; Epistemology; Hegemony; History of sociology; Industrialization; Marginality; Positivism; Social conditions & trends; Social relations; Sociology; positivism; sociological canon; race; Black sociology; classical theory
• ISSN: 2332-6492; 2332-6506
• DOI: 10.1177/23326492231170533

This article contributes to a movement to interrogate the history and foundation of sociology. The current hegemonic narrative credits a few European men for establishing sociology as a mechanism for using science to understand social conditions amid the rise of industrialization and modern capitalism. This hegemonic story defines positivism as a central concern in the foundation of the discipline, justifying its continued dominance in U.S. sociology and using binary logic to position non-positivist approaches as subordinate and unscientific. In this article, we explore the ways early Black sociologists integrated positivist and non-positivist approaches in their work to arrive at truth and discuss ways that transcending binary distinctions facilitated rich developments in their understanding of social relations and institutions. We draw on existing scholarship to argue that privileging binary logic helped justify these scholars’ marginalization in the sociological canon and conclude with recommendations to move the discipline beyond the positivism/non-positivism binary as an important mechanism for transformation. In so doing, we contribute to the growing body of scholarship aimed at correcting the history of sociology and reimagining the foundational works and epistemological approaches to foster liberation within the discipline.