The Sikkim–Tibet Convention of 1890 and the Younghusband Mission of 1904

• Published in: China report (New Delhi) Vol. 57; no. 4; pp. 451 - 465
• Main Author: Thejalhoukho
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Delhi, India SAGE Publications 01.11.2021; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Foreign policy; Territorial issues; Treaties; Tibet; China; India; boundary; Lhasa Convention; Sikkim–Tibet Convention; negotiation; demarcation; suzerainty; Younghusband mission
• ISSN: 0009-4455; 0973-063X
• DOI: 10.1177/00094455211047078

The controversy surrounding the Simla Conference of 1913–1914 and the legality of the McMahon line, which was produced by the Conference, has been at the centre of the boundary dispute between India and China. Amidst the diverging opinions amongst scholars and political commentators, the main issue rest on the unresolved question of Tibet’s political status. Was Lhasa authorised to sign treaties for Tibet? Was China the sovereign over Tibet? The answers to such questions are murky and complicated, made more so by the politics and conflicts in the post colonial period. This study attempts to highlight the complicated nature of political authority in Tibet through a study of British policy in Tibet towards the end of 19th and early 20th centuries. The signing of the 1890 Convention with China and the 1904 Convention with Tibet represents two extremes in British foreign policy which attest to the confounding situation presented before the British and the diverging opinions within the British official circles. The period between these two conventions provides a glimpse of the historical background in which the relations between British India, China and Tibet developed subsequently.