How to Bridge the Gaps between Competing Paradigms for EU Law: An Introduction

• Published in: Perspectives on Federalism Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. E-I - E-XIX
• Main Authors: Simoncini, Marta, Straetmans, Gert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: De Gruyter Open 01.11.2017; Centre for Studies on Federalism
• Subjects: crises; EU law; European Union; paradigms
• ISSN: 2036-5438; 2036-5438
• DOI: 10.1515/pof-2017-0017

For the first time since its creation, the European Union (EU) has been living its probably most significant identity crisis. This crisis has its roots in different critical situations that have hit the EU, have affected its functioning and have fundamentally questioned its legitimacy. The gaps in the EU integration process have been uncovered and the fragmentation of EU policies has become a source of different risks. On the anniversary of sixty years of the Rome Treaties, this Special Issue aims to reflect on the paradigms for EU law looking beyond their competing accounts of EU integration. The analysis is developed through a series of contributions that challenge the paradigms in different directions. The discussion is articulated on two levels. On the one hand, a group of contributions focuses on the historical and legal analysis of the emergence and transformation of the EU legal order. These contributions delve deeper into the absence of a European identity and go beyond the inherent critique that the EU is a -cracy that struggles with a democratic disconnect or even deficit. On the other hand, other contributions debate paradigms and their implementation in important policy domains. These contributions aim to give a more practical perspective on the constitutional and/or administrative character of the European Union, showing its implications and concrete questions.