Comparison of the mass distributions of short-period exoplanets detected by transit and RV methods

ABSTRACT We analyse the causes of a discrepancy between the earlier obtained samples of the mass distributions of exoplanets detected by the transit method and the radial velocity (RV) one and corrected for some observational selection effects. It is found that this discrepancy can be removed by int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMonthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Letters Vol. 509; no. 1; pp. L17 - L20
Main Authors Yakovlev, Oleg Ya, Ananyeva, V I, Ivanova, A E, Tavrov, A V
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford University Press 01.01.2022
Oxford Journals
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT We analyse the causes of a discrepancy between the earlier obtained samples of the mass distributions of exoplanets detected by the transit method and the radial velocity (RV) one and corrected for some observational selection effects. It is found that this discrepancy can be removed by introducing the following restrictions into the procedures forming the samples: (i) to consider, among transit exoplanets, only those which masses were determined by the RV method (i.e. excluding the transit time variation method); (ii) to take into account exoplanets with orbital periods P ∈ [1, 100] days and masses M ∈ [0.02, 13]MJ (Jupiter masses). In addition, we compare here the distributions by projective masses (which is Msin i, where i is the orbital inclination of an exoplanet). For this, the mass distribution of transit exoplanets is transformed into the projective mass distribution. Due to these three changes in the procedure, the obtained RV and transit distributions exhibit a similar behaviour in an interval of M ∈ [0.02, Mmid]MJ and coincide at M ∈ [Mmid, 13]MJ, where Mmid ≈ 0.17MJ.
ISSN:1745-3925
1745-3933
1745-3933
DOI:10.1093/mnrasl/slab115