A method for quantifying how the activity of an enzyme is affected by the net charge of its nearest crowded neighbor

The electrostatic effects of protein crowding have not been systematically explored. Rather, protein crowding is generally studied with co‐solvents or crowders that are electrostatically neutral, with no methods to measure how the net charge (Z) of a crowder affects protein function. For example, ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProtein science Vol. 31; no. 9
Main Authors Koone, Jordan C., Dashnaw, Chad M., Gonzalez, Mayte, Shaw, Bryan F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.09.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The electrostatic effects of protein crowding have not been systematically explored. Rather, protein crowding is generally studied with co‐solvents or crowders that are electrostatically neutral, with no methods to measure how the net charge (Z) of a crowder affects protein function. For example, can the activity of an enzyme be affected electrostatically by the net charge of its neighbor in crowded milieu? This paper reports a method for crowding proteins of different net charge to an enzyme via semi‐random chemical crosslinking. As a proof of concept, RNase A was crowded (at distances ≤ the Debye length) via crosslinking to different heme proteins with Z = +8.50 ± 0.04, Z = +6.39 ± 0.12, or Z = −10.30 ± 1.32. Crosslinking did not disrupt the structure of proteins, according to amide H/D exchange, and did not inhibit RNase A activity. For RNase A, we found that the electrostatic environment of each crowded neighbor had significant effects on rates of RNA hydrolysis. Crowding with cationic cytochrome c led to increases in activity, while crowding with anionic “supercharged” cytochrome c or myoglobin diminished activity. Surprisingly, electrostatic crowding effects were amplified at high ionic strength (I = 0.201 M) and attenuated at low ionic strength (I = 0.011 M). This salt dependence might be caused by a unique set of electric double layers at the dimer interspace (maximum distance of 8 Å, which cannot accommodate four layers). This new method of crowding via crosslinking can be used to search for electrostatic effects in protein crowding.
Bibliography:Funding information National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: CHE: 2203441; Welch Foundation, Grant/Award Number: AA‐1854
Review Editor: Aitziber Cortajarena
ISSN:0961-8368
1469-896X
DOI:10.1002/pro.4384