Predicting psychologists’ approach to academic reciprocity and data sharing with a theory of collective action

• Published in: Electronic library Vol. 41; no. 2/3; pp. 223 - 241
• Main Authors: Lee, Tae Hee, Jung, Mina, Kim, Youngseek
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Emerald Publishing Limited 24.05.2023; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Association (Psychology); Behavior; Behavioral Science Research; Behavioral Sciences; Beliefs; Collaboration; Collective action; Community Benefits; Community Relations; Ethics; Funding; Information sharing; Institutional Administration; Literature Reviews; Metadata; Norms; Open access; Organizational Theories; Periodicals; Psychological research; Psychologists; Psychology; Reciprocity; Reputation; Reputations; Resistance (Psychology); Science; Scientists; Statistical Data; Academic reciprocity; Theory of collective action; Community benefit; Subjective norms; Data sharing; Academic reputation
• ISSN: 0264-0473; 1758-616X; 0264-0473
• DOI: 10.1108/EL-10-2022-0232

Purpose This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the data sharing habits of psychologists with respect to academic reciprocity. Design/methodology/approach A research model was developed based on Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action to map psychologists’ underlying motivations for data sharing. The model was validated by data from a survey of 427 psychologists, primarily from the psychological sciences and related disciplines. Findings This study found that data sharing among psychologists is driven primarily by their perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and the norms of data sharing. This study also found that academic reciprocity is significantly influenced by psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing. Both academic reputation and academic reciprocity are affected by psychologists’ prior experiences with data reuse. Additionally, psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits and the norms of data sharing are significantly affected by the perception of their academic reputation. Research limitations/implications This study suggests that Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action can provide a new theoretical lens in understanding psychologists’ data sharing behaviours. Practical implications This study suggests several practical implications for the design and promotion of data sharing in the research community of psychology. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the initial studies that applied the theory of collective action to the mechanisms of reputation, community benefits, norms and reciprocity in psychologists’ data sharing behaviour. This research demonstrates that perceived community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing can all encourage academic reciprocity, and psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and data sharing norms all facilitate their data sharing intentions.