Assessment of Rainfall Estimates Using a Standard Z–R Relationship and the Probability Matching Method Applied to Composite Radar Data in Central Florida

• Published in: Journal of applied meteorology (1988) Vol. 35; no. 8; pp. 1203 - 1219
• Main Authors: Crosson, William L., Duchon, Claude E., Raghavan, Ravikumar, Goodman, Steven J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston, MA American Meteorological Society 01.08.1996
• Subjects: Climate models; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; External geophysics; Meteorology; Precipitation; Radar; Radar data; Radar echoes; Rain; Rain gauges; Reflectance; Signal reflection; Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation); Florida; United States; North America; America; USA, Florida; Florida, United States; Rain; Analysis method; Rain gauge; Radar observation
• ISSN: 0894-8763; 1520-0450
• DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<1203:AOREUA>2.0.CO;2

Precipitation estimates from radar systems are a crucial component of many hydrometeorological applications, from flash flood forecasting to regional water budget studies. For analyses on large spatial scales and long timescales, it is frequently necessary to use composite reflectivities from a network of radar systems. Such composite products are useful for regional or national studies, but introduce a set of difficulties not encountered when using single radars. For instance, each contributing radar has its own calibration and scanning characteristics, but radar identification may not be retained in the compositing procedure. As a result, range effects on signal return cannot be taken into account. This paper assesses the accuracy with which composite radar imagery can be used to estimate precipitation in the convective environment of Florida during the summer of 1991. Results using Z = 300R1.4 (WSR-88D default Z–R relationship) are compared with those obtained using the probability matching method (PMM). Rainfall derived from the power law Z–R was found to be highly biased (+90%–110%) compared to rain gauge measurements for various temporal and spatial integrations. Application of a 36.5-dBZ reflectivity threshold (determined via the PMM) was found to improve the performance of the power law Z–R, reducing the biases substantially to 20%–33%. Correlations between precipitation estimates obtained with either Z–R relationship and mean gauge values are much higher for areal averages than for point locations. Precipitation estimates from the PMM are an improvement over those obtained using the power law in that biases and root-mean-square errors are much lower. The minimum timescale for application of the PMM with the composite radar dataset was found to be several days for area-average precipitation. The minimum spatial scale is harder to quantify, although it is concluded that it is less than 350 km2. Implications relevant to the WSR-88D system are discussed.