Avian translocations restore dual interaction networks in an island ecosystem

• Published in: Restoration ecology Vol. 31; no. 1
• Main Authors: Lim, Ganges, Burns, Kevin C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.01.2023; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Bird impact; Birds; Ecosystem recovery; Ecosystem services; Endangered & extinct species; Endangered animals; Endangered species; Flowers; Frugivory; Fruits; Indigenous animals; Indigenous species; mutualism; Nectivory; network; Networks; plants; Pollinators; Predators; Rare species; Recovery; Reintroduction; Restoration; Species extinction; Threatened species; Translocation
• ISSN: 1061-2971; 1526-100X
• DOI: 10.1111/rec.13768

Many island bird species have been driven to extinction by introduced predators. Although poorly understood, these extinctions could have a 2‐fold impact on bird–plant mutualisms, because island bird species can serve as both pollinators and seed dispersers. We investigated how avian translocations into a mammal‐free reserve in New Zealand affected the structure of bird–flower and bird–fruit interactions. We observed bird–fruit and bird–flower interactions over a 9‐year period to establish (1) the extent to which native birds are both nectivorous and frugivorous (i.e. “dual mutualists”) and (2) how avian translocations and conservation reestablished nectivory and frugivory networks. Results showed that all but one native bird species were dual mutualists. Pairwise species interaction frequencies were positively correlated between networks. However, overall levels of nectivory by each bird species were unrelated to levels of frugivory. Interaction specialization and species strength also did not differ between networks. The reintroduction of threatened and endangered bird species appeared to have restored both interaction networks, and the sequence of species recovery accelerated restorative changes. Overall results indicate that not only does the extinction of dual mutualists have a 2‐fold, negative effect on mutualistic interactions with plants, they can also accelerate the recovery of ecosystem services following restoration efforts.