Effectiveness of CT in evaluating intrathoracic masses

To compare the effectiveness of computed tomography (CT) with conventional radiography and conventional tomography for evaluating masses in the thorax, 168 masses, 154 of which were histologically verified, which had been examined with CT were reviewed. In 74 instances (44%) CT provided important ad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 139; no. 3; pp. 469 - 475
Main Authors Sones, PJ, Jr, Torres, WE, Colvin, RS, Meier, WL, Sprawls, P, Rogers, JV, Jr
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.09.1982
Subjects
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Radiation Dosage
Thoracic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:To compare the effectiveness of computed tomography (CT) with conventional radiography and conventional tomography for evaluating masses in the thorax, 168 masses, 154 of which were histologically verified, which had been examined with CT were reviewed. In 74 instances (44%) CT provided important additional information compared with conventional radiography. Compared to conventional tomography, CT added important information in 15 (23%) of 65 cases. In no case did CT fail to demonstrate pathology shown with the other two methods. Average radiation dose to the chest was 1.3 rad (0.013 Gy) with CT and 0.4 rad (0.004 Gy) with linear tomography. Although CT is associated with slightly greater radiation dose and cost, this review indicates it should be performed directly after plain film examination instead of conventional tomography when further investigation of an intrathoracic mass is indicated.
ISSN:0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI:10.2214/ajr.139.3.469