Theory Building in Knowledge Management In Search of Paradigms

The development of knowledge management (KM) in theory and praxis continues to involve a wide range of disciplines and contributors, each bringing their respective experiences, beliefs, and practices. Two of the main disciplines that contribute to the KM discourse are information systems and managem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of management inquiry Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 31 - 42
Main Authors Hazlett, Shirley-Ann, McAdam, Rodney, Gallagher, Séamus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2005
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The development of knowledge management (KM) in theory and praxis continues to involve a wide range of disciplines and contributors, each bringing their respective experiences, beliefs, and practices. Two of the main disciplines that contribute to the KM discourse are information systems and management. However, this study of KM has revealed an apparent dichotomy between those researchers from an information systems background and those from a management background. Approaches and models based on each perspective have emerged, but there is little evidence of synergy and convergence. This article shows that attempts to develop an optimal KM methodology are misplaced unless the underlying assumptions and paradigms are identified and understood. Furthermore, it is proposed that KM is currently in a state of “pre-science,” wherein proponents of different paradigms have their own beliefs and values and often disagree with others about fundamentals within the field.
ISSN:1056-4926
1552-6542
DOI:10.1177/1056492604273730