Protecting Life or Managing Risk? Suicide Prevention and the Lure of Medicalized Control

• Published in: Christian bioethics Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 152 - 163
• Main Author: Kinghorn, Warren
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: US Oxford University Press 19.06.2023
• ISSN: 1380-3603; 1744-4195
• DOI: 10.1093/cb/cbad010

Abstract Suicide is a leading cause of death in the United States and in many other parts of the world. As such, suicide is frequently framed as a medical and public health problem for which solutions are best recommended by medical and public health authorities. While, medicalized suicide prevention strategies often resonate with traditional Christian commitments to preserve life and to discourage suicide, there is little evidence to date that medical approaches to suicide risk-reduction decrease population rates of suicide. Further, by treating suicide as a phenomenon that can be eliminated through technical managerial control, modern suicide prevention efforts construe suffering persons as carriers of risk best managed by standardized and often dehumanizing environments of care. This emphasis on the medical management of risk also erodes the clinician–patient relationship and inappropriately centers medical (e.g., systematic health screenings) rather than non-medical (e.g., access to housing) forms of response. Although, medicalized suicide prevention efforts should not be dismantled, those working to prevent suicide would do well to prioritize a positive commitment to human dignity and worth and to engage social and political systems beyond medicine and public health, while drawing on specific contributions that clinicians can offer.