Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby

• Published in: Sports medicine international open Vol. 3; no. 1; pp. E25 - E31
• Main Authors: Schulze, Antina, Kwast, Stefan, Busse, Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Stuttgart · New York Georg Thieme Verlag KG 01.01.2019
• Subjects: Training & Testing; mouthguard; performance; ergogenic aid; rugby
• ISSN: 2367-1890; 2367-1890
• DOI: 10.1055/a-0891-7021

Abstract Mouthguards (MGs) are highly recommended in rugby. Airway obstruction and a resulting decrease in power output are potential disadvantages of their usage. The aim of the study was to assess possible limitations of “vented” (MG V ) and custom-made mouthguards (MG C ) on rugby players’ performance. The MG effects were investigated in 13 male first-league rugby players ranging from 18–34 years old. First a lung function test was completed. Then a double incremental treadmill test was performed to measure maximum aerobic performance, ventilation, VO 2 , VCO 2 , heart rate, and lactate. Effects on sprint times (10 and 40 m) and countermovement jumps were also investigated. Peak flow values were significantly decreased with MG V by about 0.9 l/s. Neither ventilatory parameters nor oxygen uptake were affected by either of the mouthguards. Maximum lactate was significantly decreased in both MG types vs. no MG use. The maximum running velocity was similar in all tests. The aerobic energy turnover was moderately increased with the MG C and MG V . No effects were seen on sprint times or jump tests. Although neither type of mouthguard had a significant impact on maximum performance in treadmill running, the anaerobic energy turnover was decreased.