Validity evidence and measurement equivalence for the Dutch translation of the conditional reasoning test for aggression

• Published in: Applied psychology Vol. 71; no. 2; pp. 710 - 739
• Main Authors: LeBreton, James M., Reichin, Sydney L., Nijenhuis, Jan, Cremers, Myckel, Heijden‐Lek, Kitty
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2022
• Subjects: aggression; Aggressiveness; Dutch version; English language; Inductive reasoning; industrial/organizational psychology; integrity; Measurement; measurement invariance; Morality; personality; Personality traits; Quantitative psychology; The Netherlands; Translation; United States; United States > US
• ISSN: 0269-994X; 1464-0597
• DOI: 10.1111/apps.12309

The Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression (CRT‐A) indirectly measures the implicit motive to aggress by engaging respondents in inductive reasoning tasks. Most research involving the CRT‐A has been based on the original English version of the test with most data being collected in the United States. The purpose of the current paper is to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Dutch translation of this test and to examine if it could be used to predict measures of integrity. In the first of two studies, we evaluated the psychometric properties and measurement equivalence of the CRT‐A across US and Dutch samples. In the second study, we examined validity evidence for the Dutch version of the CRT‐A. Results from Study 1 indicated that the test was mostly equivalent across cultures (i.e. limited differential item functioning was detected). Results from Study 2 demonstrated that the Dutch version of the CRT‐A was correlated with measures of behavioral integrity and provided incremental prediction of integrity over and above traditional self‐report measures of explicit personality traits. We discuss the implications for using CRTs across different cultures and languages.