March for Sozialgeographie“? Rechtspopulismus als Zumutung und die regressive Moderne als Herausforderung der Humangeographie
The paper outlines an approach to right wing populism in recent years not only in critizing the use of so called alternative facts but using the concept of a regressive modernisation as a debate which includes populist movements into a broader social theory and diagnosis of western societies. The ev...
Saved in:
Published in | Geographica Helvetica Vol. 73; no. 4; pp. 309 - 319 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English German |
Published |
Copernicus Publications
08.11.2018
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The paper outlines an approach to right wing populism in recent years not
only in critizing the use of so called alternative facts but using the
concept of a regressive modernisation as a debate which includes populist
movements into a broader social theory and diagnosis of western societies.
The evolution of regressive modernisation reveals both, the success of a
neoliberal globalization and a rise of marginality and perceived dangers of a
downward mobility. These findings are used in order to explain certain
transformations of academic fields in general and social geography in
particular. It is argued that the success of postmodern geographies may be
seen as an overcoming of hegemonic discourses of positivism as well as of
marxism, but was and is unable to counteract geographies of recent right wing
populism. Even the positions of the „march for science“ which has
been a major initiative to fight for academic integrity are seen as not being
sufficient to rebuilt an „antipopulist“ social geography. This
situation leads to some suggestions and recommendation for further work in
this field. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2194-8798 0016-7312 2194-8798 |
DOI: | 10.5194/gh-73-309-2018 |