Biometric and Structural Ocular Manifestations of Anterior Megalophthalmos

The aim of this study was to examine the biometric ocular manifestations and structural ocular features of anterior megalophthalmos (AM). Fifteen patients with AM (30 eyes) from the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University were included. The age-matched control group consisted of 30 participants (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in medicine Vol. 9; p. 732452
Main Authors Chen, Tian-Hui, Chen, Ze-Xu, Zhang, Min, Chen, Jia-Hui, Lan, Li-Na, Jiang, Yongxiang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 19.05.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to examine the biometric ocular manifestations and structural ocular features of anterior megalophthalmos (AM). Fifteen patients with AM (30 eyes) from the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University were included. The age-matched control group consisted of 30 participants (30 eyes) who underwent Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700 measurements for one normal eye. Data on demographics, biometric manifestations, and genotypes were carefully compared. A total of 15 patients with AM and 30 control patients were enrolled. There were no differences in age (37.27 ± 19.1 vs. 31.43 ± 19.69 years, = 0.249) between these two groups. AM eyes were characterized by premature cataracts (11/30, 36.67%) and zonular weakness with lens subluxation (22/30, 73.33%) compared with the control group. Notably, 20 of the 30 AM eyes (66.67%) had significant posterior iris bowing, and 16 of the 30 AM eyes (53.33%) showed an enlarged ciliary ring on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Mean corneal curvature was lower in the AM eyes (42.01 ± 2.06 D vs. 43.14 ± 1.38 D, = 0.023). There was no significant difference in corneal pachymetry and central endothelial cell count between the AM and control groups. Significant differences were found in terms of the anterior chamber and white-to-white (WTW) among the Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700 in patients with AM ( < 0.05). The difference was 0.53 ± 0.48 mm and 0.36 ± 0.14 mm, respectively ( < 0.001). The results of this cohort study conclude the biometric and structural ocular manifestations in Chinese cohorts. Posterior iris bowing (66.67%) and lens subluxation (73.33%) are the most characteristic findings in patients with AM with anatomical abnormalities of megalocornea and a deep anterior chamber, although corneal biometric manifestations of AM included flatter cornea and lower total corneal astigmatism. The knowledge of ocular manifestations of AM is important for diagnosis and preparation for the operation in advance to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications. Significant differences were found in the anterior chamber and WTW values between the Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700. Thus, we suggest that various examinations should be carefully considered before determining an AM diagnosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Zhenzhen Liu, Sun Yat-sen University, China
This article was submitted to Ophthalmology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine
Reviewed by: Jinhai Huang, Fudan University, China; Lei Qiong, Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital, China; Kirk Stephenson, University Hospital Galway, Ireland
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.732452