Descriptive Norms for 171 Idiomatic Expressions: Familiarity, Compositionality, Predictability, and Literality

Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions rated by 226 subjects on the dimensions of familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality are reported. Different theoretical positions concerning the comprehension of idioms are discussed, and the relevance of each dimension to idiom pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetaphor and symbolic activity Vol. 9; no. 4; pp. 247 - 270
Main Authors Titone, Debra A., Connine, Cynthia M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 01.12.1994
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0885-7253
DOI10.1207/s15327868ms0904_1

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions rated by 226 subjects on the dimensions of familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality are reported. Different theoretical positions concerning the comprehension of idioms are discussed, and the relevance of each dimension to idiom processing is described. The dimension of predictability correlated significantly with alternative ratings of familiarity. Literality negatively correlated with abnormal decomposability. Inconsistencies between the compositionality ratings obtained in the present study and prior studies (e.g., Gibbs, Nayak, & Cutting, 1989) are noted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-7253
DOI:10.1207/s15327868ms0904_1