Descriptive Norms for 171 Idiomatic Expressions: Familiarity, Compositionality, Predictability, and Literality
Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions rated by 226 subjects on the dimensions of familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality are reported. Different theoretical positions concerning the comprehension of idioms are discussed, and the relevance of each dimension to idiom pr...
Saved in:
Published in | Metaphor and symbolic activity Vol. 9; no. 4; pp. 247 - 270 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
01.12.1994
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0885-7253 |
DOI | 10.1207/s15327868ms0904_1 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions rated by 226 subjects on the dimensions of familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality are reported. Different theoretical positions concerning the comprehension of idioms are discussed, and the relevance of each dimension to idiom processing is described. The dimension of predictability correlated significantly with alternative ratings of familiarity. Literality negatively correlated with abnormal decomposability. Inconsistencies between the compositionality ratings obtained in the present study and prior studies (e.g., Gibbs, Nayak, & Cutting, 1989) are noted. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0885-7253 |
DOI: | 10.1207/s15327868ms0904_1 |