How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem 'Special'

Psycholinguistic research has shown that, with appropriate context, people take no longer to understand metaphors than to understand semantically comparable literal language. This finding is often taken to suggest that identical mental processes drive the comprehension of both literal and metaphoric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetaphor and symbolic activity Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 145 - 158
Main Authors Gibbs Jr, Raymond W., Gerrig, Richard J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 01.09.1989
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0885-7253
DOI10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Psycholinguistic research has shown that, with appropriate context, people take no longer to understand metaphors than to understand semantically comparable literal language. This finding is often taken to suggest that identical mental processes drive the comprehension of both literal and metaphorical utterances. We suggest that this claim does not necessarily follow from the experimental results. Various masking processes could foster the "incorrect illusion" of equivalence. However, a parsimonious account of the processes underlying comprehension can be motivated for both metaphorical and literal utterances. What makes metaphor "special" is in the products of comprehension, not in the process by which metaphorical meanings are understood.
AbstractList Psycholinguistic research has shown that, with appropriate context, people take no longer to understand metaphors than to understand semantically comparable literal language. This finding is often taken to suggest that identical mental processes drive the comprehension of both literal and metaphorical utterances. We suggest that this claim does not necessarily follow from the experimental results. Various masking processes could foster the "incorrect illusion" of equivalence. However, a parsimonious account of the processes underlying comprehension can be motivated for both metaphorical and literal utterances. What makes metaphor "special" is in the products of comprehension, not in the process by which metaphorical meanings are understood.
Psycholinguistic research has shown that, with appropriate context, people take no longer to understand metaphors than to understand semantically comparable literal language. This finding is often taken to suggest that identical mental processes drive the comprehension of both literal & metaphorical utterances. It is suggested that this claim does not necessarily follow from the experimental results. Various masking processes could foster the "incorrect illusion" of equivalence. However, a parsimonious account of the processes underlying comprehension can be motivated for both metaphorical & literal utterances. What makes metaphor "special" is in the products of comprehension, not in the process by which metaphorical meanings are understood. 31 References. HA
Author Gerrig, Richard J.
Gibbs Jr, Raymond W.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Raymond W.
  surname: Gibbs Jr
  fullname: Gibbs Jr, Raymond W.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Richard J.
  surname: Gerrig
  fullname: Gerrig, Richard J.
BookMark eNp9kDFPwzAUhD0UiTbwA9gy0SlgJ3biSCyoAorUiqEwW47zrBoSO9iuSv89QWUCwXTS6X2nezdDE-ssIHRB8BXJcXUdCCvyipe8D5jiQhQTNMWcs6zKWXGKZiG8YkwpJeUUVUu3TxfORviI6Vq-QUjXEOWwdX60-8HDFmwwzqYbgD6dbwZQRnbzM3SiZRfg_FsT9HJ_97xYZqunh8fF7SpTOatjxrFWqoVSlVzjUreYKIJpW1RUUllhBU0zSksplqSmwErVEE7qhkjSNoTqIkGXx9zBu_cdhCh6ExR0nbTgdkFwxnDNxi8TVB0PlXcheNBCmSjj2Dx6aTpBsPgaR_waZyTJD3Lwppf-8C9zc2SM1c73cu9814ooD53z2kurTBDF3_gnqo1_Vw
CODEN MSACEW
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms0604_1
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms0602_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10849_019_09282_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ipm_2024_103652
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_021_01639_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_2166_01_00045_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_0304_422X_93_90026_D
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15516709cog1902_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_bsl_2370090205
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms1001_4
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms1302_1
crossref_primary_10_1515_mc_2019_0006
crossref_primary_10_3758_BF03213009
crossref_primary_10_1075_ijolc_00065_boi
crossref_primary_10_1080_09541449108406226
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12124_024_09838_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2018_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1080_01638539409544895
crossref_primary_10_1080_01638539309544846
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms2001_1
crossref_primary_10_1027_1618_3169_a000422
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12113_007_9024_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0024_3841_99_00041_8
crossref_primary_10_1515_text_2010_002
crossref_primary_10_1006_jmla_1997_2527
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_022_02072_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_09571736_2016_1221441
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13162657
crossref_primary_10_1177_105382599802100103
crossref_primary_10_1075_ssol_18009_gib
crossref_primary_10_1080_01690969008402102
crossref_primary_10_1080_10926488_2018_1549837
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2015_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_2166_99_00006_5
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms0503_3
crossref_primary_10_1006_brln_2001_2610
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2010_03_017
crossref_primary_10_15581_008_38_2_666_94
crossref_primary_10_1111_lnc3_12327
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03400705
crossref_primary_10_1044_1058_0360_2003_055
crossref_primary_10_1080_10926488_2020_1821203
crossref_primary_10_1006_cogp_1998_0689
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1751_9004_2010_00292_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_10400419_2017_1263502
crossref_primary_10_29000_rumelide_1222126
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneuroling_2014_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_10350330_2021_1971493
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms0801_2
crossref_primary_10_1006_brln_2000_2431
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_2166_97_00045_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_2166_99_00005_3
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_019_01300_7
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_017_0903_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_03_027
crossref_primary_10_1145_2382434_2382436
crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327868MS151_2_4
crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327868MS1603_4_9
crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327868MS1603_4_7
crossref_primary_10_18492_dad_725338
crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327868MS1603_4_3
crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms1103_3
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_957944
Cites_doi 10.3758/BF03213418
10.1207/s15327868ms0301_1
10.1016/0001-6918(86)90004-1
10.1016/S0364-0213(84)80004-X
10.1037//0278-7393.9.4.667
10.2307/2182440
10.1353/phl.1986.0033
10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.3
10.1080/01638538609544629
10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4
10.1037//0278-7393.9.3.524
10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
10.1080/01638537909544450
10.1007/BF01068037
10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9
10.3758/BF03213344
10.1177/002383098502800206
10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90355-9
10.3758/BF03335150
10.7591/9781501741326
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1989
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1989
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7T9
DOI 10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3
DatabaseName CrossRef
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
DatabaseTitleList
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Languages & Literatures
EndPage 158
ExternalDocumentID 10_1207_s15327868ms0403_3
9678648
GroupedDBID .4H
07M
3LD
ABDBF
ABVXC
ABWZE
ACUHS
ACZ
ADIUE
ADXAZ
AFFNX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
C5A
CBZAQ
CKOZC
CQ1
C~T
EAP
EHI
EMK
EPL
EPS
ESX
FXNIP
H13
HMHOC
JLMOS
L7Y
LPU
MLAFT
MVM
QZZOY
TBH
TDBHL
TFW
UA1
YNT
YQT
AAYXX
CITATION
M4Z
7T9
ADLFI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-80fccde6c68f06fd01c104d374a4a70cebba70d440a194e56cb1819b1a1db14f3
ISSN 0885-7253
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 06:18:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:10:41 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:44 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 08:59:40 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c259t-80fccde6c68f06fd01c104d374a4a70cebba70d440a194e56cb1819b1a1db14f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 85509540
PQPubID 23478
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327868ms0403_3
crossref_citationtrail_10_1207_s15327868ms0403_3
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1207_s15327868ms0403_3
proquest_miscellaneous_85509540
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 9/1/1989
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1989-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 1989
  text: 9/1/1989
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1980
PublicationTitle Metaphor and symbolic activity
PublicationYear 1989
Publisher Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
References p_9_44
p_5_40
p_7_42
Grice H. P. (p_22_57) 1968; 4
p_31_66
p_1_36
p_3_38
p_13_48
Gibbs R. (p_18_53) 1985; 28
p_29_64
p_27_62
p_20_55
Grice H. P. (p_21_56) 1957; 66
Harris R. (p_24_59) 1976; 8
p_8_43
p_19_54
p_17_52
Gibbs R. (p_11_46) 1980; 8
p_15_50
p_6_41
Gibbs R. (p_10_45) 1979; 2
p_30_65
Inhoff A. (p_26_61) 1984; 12
p_2_37
p_4_39
p_12_47
p_14_49
p_28_63
Harrison B. (p_25_60) 1986; 10
Gibbs R. (p_16_51) 1986; 9
p_23_58
References_xml – volume: 8
  start-page: 449
  year: 1980
  ident: p_11_46
  publication-title: Memory & Cognition
  doi: 10.3758/BF03213418
– ident: p_30_65
– ident: p_8_43
  doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms0301_1
– ident: p_14_49
  doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(86)90004-1
– ident: p_13_48
  doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(84)80004-X
– ident: p_23_58
– ident: p_9_44
  doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.9.4.667
– volume: 66
  start-page: 377
  year: 1957
  ident: p_21_56
  publication-title: Meaning. Philosophical Review
  doi: 10.2307/2182440
– ident: p_3_38
– volume: 10
  start-page: 38
  year: 1986
  ident: p_25_60
  publication-title: Philosophy and Literature
  doi: 10.1353/phl.1986.0033
– ident: p_17_52
– ident: p_2_37
– ident: p_7_42
– ident: p_15_50
  doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.3
– volume: 9
  start-page: 17
  year: 1986
  ident: p_16_51
  publication-title: Discourse Processes
  doi: 10.1080/01638538609544629
– ident: p_20_55
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4
– ident: p_12_47
  doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.9.3.524
– ident: p_6_41
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1
  year: 1968
  ident: p_22_57
  publication-title: Foundations of Language
– ident: p_31_66
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1
  year: 1979
  ident: p_10_45
  publication-title: Discourse Processes
  doi: 10.1080/01638537909544450
– ident: p_5_40
– ident: p_27_62
  doi: 10.1007/BF01068037
– ident: p_28_63
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9
– ident: p_4_39
– volume: 12
  start-page: 558
  year: 1984
  ident: p_26_61
  publication-title: Memory & Cognition
  doi: 10.3758/BF03213344
– volume: 28
  start-page: 177
  year: 1985
  ident: p_18_53
  publication-title: Language and Speech
  doi: 10.1177/002383098502800206
– ident: p_19_54
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90355-9
– volume: 8
  start-page: 312
  year: 1976
  ident: p_24_59
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society
  doi: 10.3758/BF03335150
– ident: p_29_64
– ident: p_1_36
  doi: 10.7591/9781501741326
SSID ssj0044416
Score 1.266757
Snippet Psycholinguistic research has shown that, with appropriate context, people take no longer to understand metaphors than to understand semantically comparable...
SourceID proquest
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 145
SubjectTerms Context Effects in Perception
Psycholinguistics
Rhetorical Figures
Semantics
Title How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem 'Special'
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3
https://www.proquest.com/docview/85509540
Volume 4
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZge-EFcWfc5gdgElUqx3bs9HFjTFO18rSJvUW24zC0tZ2aTGL8eo4vSdoOJsZLUiW11eY7OTf7fAeh98zQ0jWwSgjXIuHUqkTnPE-Y5RX1FGPW5TsmX8XhCR-fZqd9o0tfXdLoofn1x7qS_0EVrgGurkr2Dsh2k8IF-Az4whEQhuM_Yez6wXl6qZ_NYKLObT2Y2EZdns0X_j1f2DO3Pd1rBDsFkGXsNv8hFMq3Tmk3yCfRr6facQV7lg3XWKLbofND63owDvux1fXUFb58G3Z3HcPj96VS_cF42GcUVrZM9YrHtbgNJL6tluRLwsCWNF4a2CCj8UwDD_sNvUxjnXLGqMxFPq1Bd7CC9UaoXXhfs03djkEXq1DPrrw2xX20SaV0K_Sbu3v7ewetGebg54kQQoQ_E5e0qa-bXJtkxSlZoay9YaK933H8CD2MAQPeDeg_Rvfs7Al6cRTTzDX-iI86Zuz6KZIgEzjKBPYygVt48YpMYCcTeCdKxM4zdHLw5fjzYRKbYyQGItYGPIvKmNIKI_KKiKokqYHIumSSK64kMVZrOJWcE5WOuM2E0eDMjXSq0lKnvGLP0cZsPrMvEdYEjIzVRFOp3LKuBhcPwgYltJSjKhNbiLRPpzCROd41MLko_orKFvrUDbkMtCm3fTlbfuRF43NVVWgsU7Bbxm232BSgFN1Kl5rZ-VVdOJY-UDPk1V1-xmv0oH8b3qCNZnFl34LH2eh3UbZ-A0uQe0A
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+Context+Makes+Metaphor+Comprehension+Seem+%27Special%27&rft.jtitle=Metaphor+and+symbolic+activity&rft.au=Gibbs+Jr%2C+Raymond+W.&rft.au=Gerrig%2C+Richard+J.&rft.date=1989-09-01&rft.issn=0885-7253&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=158&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207%2Fs15327868ms0403_3&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1207_s15327868ms0403_3
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0885-7253&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0885-7253&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0885-7253&client=summon