How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem 'Special'

Psycholinguistic research has shown that, with appropriate context, people take no longer to understand metaphors than to understand semantically comparable literal language. This finding is often taken to suggest that identical mental processes drive the comprehension of both literal and metaphoric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetaphor and symbolic activity Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 145 - 158
Main Authors Gibbs Jr, Raymond W., Gerrig, Richard J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 01.09.1989
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0885-7253
DOI10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Psycholinguistic research has shown that, with appropriate context, people take no longer to understand metaphors than to understand semantically comparable literal language. This finding is often taken to suggest that identical mental processes drive the comprehension of both literal and metaphorical utterances. We suggest that this claim does not necessarily follow from the experimental results. Various masking processes could foster the "incorrect illusion" of equivalence. However, a parsimonious account of the processes underlying comprehension can be motivated for both metaphorical and literal utterances. What makes metaphor "special" is in the products of comprehension, not in the process by which metaphorical meanings are understood.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-7253
DOI:10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3