Understanding Versus Discriminating Nonliteral Utterances: Evidence for a Dissociation

According to Olson (1988), full comprehension of nonliteral language must include the recognition of the implied meaning of the utterance and an awareness that there are two distinct levels of meaning-what is said and what is meant. Three experiments were performed to investigate children's com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetaphor and symbolic activity Vol. 10; no. 4; pp. 255 - 273
Main Authors de Groot, André, Kaplan, Joan, Rosenblatt, Elizabeth, Dews, Shelly, Winner, Ellen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 01.12.1995
Subjects
Children
Comprehension
Intonation
Language Acquisition
Meaning
Metaphors
Rhetorical Figures
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0885-7253
DOI10.1207/s15327868ms1004_2

Cover

More Information
Summary:According to Olson (1988), full comprehension of nonliteral language must include the recognition of the implied meaning of the utterance and an awareness that there are two distinct levels of meaning-what is said and what is meant. Three experiments were performed to investigate children's comprehension of nonliteral language and their awareness of the say-mean distinction in such language. In Experiment 1, children heard irony modeled and were asked to produce similar utterances. Six-year-olds produced literal insults, showing that they understood the modeled irony but were not aware of the say-mean distinction. In Experiment 2, 6- and 7-year-olds were tested for awareness and comprehension of both metaphor and irony.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-7253
DOI:10.1207/s15327868ms1004_2