On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications

Two experiments investigated (a) subjects' intuitions about the communicative functions of irony and (b) how communicative functions affect recall. Previous research (Long, Kreuz, & Church, 1989) suggested that ironic statements allow speakers to fulfill communication goals that are difficu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetaphor and symbolic activity Vol. 6; no. 3; pp. 149 - 162
Main Authors Kreuz, Roger J., Long, Debra L., Church, Mary B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 01.09.1991
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0885-7253
DOI10.1207/s15327868ms0603_1

Cover

More Information
Summary:Two experiments investigated (a) subjects' intuitions about the communicative functions of irony and (b) how communicative functions affect recall. Previous research (Long, Kreuz, & Church, 1989) suggested that ironic statements allow speakers to fulfill communication goals that are difficult to convey literally. The present research extends these findings by identifying which communication goals (and other factors) influence recall. In Experiment 1, subjects read scenarios that concluded with ironic or literal statements and selected goals fulfilled by the statements from a checklist. The results indicated that ironic statements fulfill more communication goals than literal statements. In Experiment 2, subjects recalled these scenarios after a 24-hr delay. Presence of irony and fulfillment of pragmatically salient goals predicted recall in a series of multiple regression analyses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-7253
DOI:10.1207/s15327868ms0603_1