Perceptions of Scientific Recommendations Mediate the Effects of Message Valence on Adult Smokers’ Intention to Use E-Cigarettes to Quit: A Conditional Process Analysis

Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been widely used by smokers as a quitting device, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions in which message characteristics influence their intention to use e-cigarettes as cessation devices remain unclear. To fill this gap, the current be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth communication pp. 1 - 13
Main Authors Yang, Qinghua, Schrodt, Paul, Zhuang, Jie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 07.07.2025
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1041-0236
1532-7027
1532-7027
DOI10.1080/10410236.2025.2521713

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been widely used by smokers as a quitting device, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions in which message characteristics influence their intention to use e-cigarettes as cessation devices remain unclear. To fill this gap, the current between-subjects experiment investigated how the valence of the messages (pro-e-cigarette, anti-e-cigarette, conflicting recommendations) current smokers are exposed to influence their intention to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation through perceived approval of using e-cigarettes among health authorities (i.e., perceptions of scientific recommendations). Participants included 249 current smokers recruited through MTurk. Our findings identified perceptions of scientific recommendations of using e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation device mediated the relationship between message valence and smokers' intention to quit with e-cigarettes. Further, the indirect relationship is conditioned by smokers' levels of education, sex, and race/ethnicity. The findings contribute to the literature on tobacco regulatory science by illuminating heterogeneity in message effects across diverse populations and providing important guidance for science-based campaign designs and interventions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1041-0236
1532-7027
1532-7027
DOI:10.1080/10410236.2025.2521713