Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Pediatric Osteoarticular Infections

Abstract Background Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP–SMX) is active against most Staphylococcus aureus isolates but is not widely used for the treatment of pediatric osteoarticular infections. Methods This was a comparative effectiveness study of hospitalized patients ≤18 years treated with TMP–SM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society Vol. 12; no. 10; pp. 534 - 539
Main Authors McDaniel, Lauren M, Fiawoo, Suiyini, Tamma, Pranita D, Same, Rebecca G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 28.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP–SMX) is active against most Staphylococcus aureus isolates but is not widely used for the treatment of pediatric osteoarticular infections. Methods This was a comparative effectiveness study of hospitalized patients ≤18 years treated with TMP–SMX vs. other antibiotic regimens for acute osteoarticular infections between 2016 and 2021 at 3 hospitals using inverse probability of treatment weighted propensity score analysis. The primary outcome was treatment failure, a composite of unanticipated emergency department (ED) or outpatient visits, hospital readmissions, extension, or change of antibiotic therapy due to inadequate clinical response, or death, all within 6 months after completing antibiotics. The secondary outcome was antibiotic-associated adverse events (AEs) within 6 months. The exposed group for the treatment failure analysis included children who received ≥7 days of TMP–SMX and did not experience treatment failure while on another antibiotic. Children receiving at least 1 dose of TMP–SMX were the exposed group for the AE analysis. Results One-hundred and sixteen patients met eligibility criteria; 26 (22.4%) patients were classified into the TMP–SMX cohort and 90 (77.6%) into the other antibiotics cohort (most commonly clindamycin, vancomycin, and cefazolin). There was no significant difference in treatment failure between TMP–SMX and other antibiotics (43% vs. 19%; 95% CI .9–10.4). More patients in the TMP–SMX cohort experienced an unplanned ED or outpatient visit (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.3–17.8). There was no difference in hospital readmission, antibiotic change, or duration extension. Exposure to TMP–SMX was associated with more AEs (41% vs. 19%, P = .012). Conclusions Treatment with TMP–SMX was not associated with greater clinical failure but was associated with more AEs compared to alternative agents for the treatment of pediatric acute osteoarticular infections. Antibiotic resistance has prompted a re-evaluation of treatment regimens for pediatric osteoarticular infections. In a propensity score weighted cohort of 116 children with acute osteoarticular infections, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was not associated with increased treatment failure but was associated with increased adverse events compared to alternative antibiotic regimens.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2048-7207
2048-7207
DOI:10.1093/jpids/piad076