Coactive scheduling and checkpoint determination during high level synthesis of self-recovering microarchitectures

The growing trend towards VLSI implementation of crucial tasks in critical applications has increased both the demand for and the scope of fault-tolerant VLSI systems. In this paper, we present a self-recovering microarchitecture synthesis system. In a self-recovering microarchitecture, intermediate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on very large scale integration (VLSI) systems Vol. 2; no. 3; pp. 304 - 311
Main Authors Orailoglu, A., Karri, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.09.1994
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1063-8210
1557-9999
DOI10.1109/92.311639

Cover

More Information
Summary:The growing trend towards VLSI implementation of crucial tasks in critical applications has increased both the demand for and the scope of fault-tolerant VLSI systems. In this paper, we present a self-recovering microarchitecture synthesis system. In a self-recovering microarchitecture, intermediate results are compared at regular intervals, and if correct saved in registers (checkpointing). On the other hand, on detecting a fault, the self-recovering microarchitecture rolls back to a previous checkpoint and retries. The proposed synthesis system comprises of a heuristic and an optimal subsystem. The heuristic synthesis subsystem has two components. Whereas the checkpoint insertion algorithm identifies good checkpoints by successively eliminating clock cycle boundaries that either have a high checkpoint overhead or violate the retry period constraint, the novel edge-based schedule, assigns edges to clock cycle boundaries, in addition to scheduling nodes to clock cycles. Also, checkpoint insertion and edge-based scheduling are intertwined using a flexible synthesis methodology. We additionally show an Integer Linear Programming model for the self-recovering microarchitecture synthesis problem. The resulting ILP formulation can minimize either the number of voters or the overall hardware, subject to constraints on the number of clock cycles the retry period, and the number of checkpoints.< >
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1063-8210
1557-9999
DOI:10.1109/92.311639