Two Bronze Herms Questions of Mass Production in Antiquity
We are all familiar with the idea that there was a Greek "original" and a Roman "copy." When the "original" no longer exists, we attempt to discover it through literary references and its "copies," which we consider in its place. Yet it has traditionally been...
Saved in:
Published in | Art journal (New York. 1960) Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 53 - 59 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, etc
Taylor & Francis
01.07.1995
College Art Association College Art Association of America College Art Association, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We are all familiar with the idea that there was a Greek "original" and a Roman "copy." When the "original" no longer exists, we attempt to discover it through literary references and its "copies," which we consider in its place. Yet it has traditionally been asserted that the "copy" is not as good as the "original," even when the Greek sculpture no longer exists for comparison. One distinction between the two has been explained as "a certain hardness of execution [which] generally differentiates the copy from the more delicately rendered Greek original... ."
1
But when we lack the "original," we tend to substitute the "copy," forgetting that there is a distinction between the two. In fact, the "copy" is often not even made of bronze, whereas we know that the lost "original" was. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-3249 2325-5307 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00043249.1995.10791692 |