Two Bronze Herms Questions of Mass Production in Antiquity

We are all familiar with the idea that there was a Greek "original" and a Roman "copy." When the "original" no longer exists, we attempt to discover it through literary references and its "copies," which we consider in its place. Yet it has traditionally been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArt journal (New York. 1960) Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 53 - 59
Main Author Mattusch, Carol C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, etc Taylor & Francis 01.07.1995
College Art Association
College Art Association of America
College Art Association, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We are all familiar with the idea that there was a Greek "original" and a Roman "copy." When the "original" no longer exists, we attempt to discover it through literary references and its "copies," which we consider in its place. Yet it has traditionally been asserted that the "copy" is not as good as the "original," even when the Greek sculpture no longer exists for comparison. One distinction between the two has been explained as "a certain hardness of execution [which] generally differentiates the copy from the more delicately rendered Greek original... ." 1 But when we lack the "original," we tend to substitute the "copy," forgetting that there is a distinction between the two. In fact, the "copy" is often not even made of bronze, whereas we know that the lost "original" was.
ISSN:0004-3249
2325-5307
DOI:10.1080/00043249.1995.10791692