International agreements for health systems development: Nature, drivers, barriers, and benefits of international partnerships

Background: This study explored the nature of international agreements (IAs) within Ontario Academic Health Science Centres (OAHSC) and presents the exploratory findings to create a basis for an academically defensible body of literature on the topic. Methods: This study employed a constructivist qu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of healthcare management Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 305 - 313
Main Author Scarffe, Andrew D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis 02.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: This study explored the nature of international agreements (IAs) within Ontario Academic Health Science Centres (OAHSC) and presents the exploratory findings to create a basis for an academically defensible body of literature on the topic. Methods: This study employed a constructivist qualitative grounded theory methodology by telephone interviewing 14 participants who held leadership positions within OAHSCs that actively participate in, or interface with institutions that participate in, IAs. Interviews lasted an average of 65 minutes per interview; in total, the interviews yielded 220 pages of verbatim interview transcription. Results: Presented using qualitative methodology, the results from this study explore the nature of IAs, as well as the different drivers, barriers, and provincial/organizational benefits of engaging in IAs from the lens of an OAHSC. Conclusion: The results from this study explore the unique drivers, barriers, and provincial/organizational benefits of pursuing IAs amongst OAHSC. In publically funded health systems, it is important to understand the different elements of IAs and be able to identify the return on investment and/or impact that these agreements are having on the systems' ability to provide high-quality care to local patients; this is only possible after close consideration of the drivers, barriers, and benefits of IAs. Research Ethics Board: REB 106331
ISSN:2047-9700
2047-9719
DOI:10.1080/20479700.2017.1397306