Foundations for natural proofs and quantifier instantiation

We give foundational results that explain the efficacy of heuristics used for dealing with quantified formulas and recursive definitions. We develop a framework for first order logic (FOL) over an uninterpreted combination of background theories. Our central technical result is that systematic term...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of ACM on programming languages Vol. 2; no. POPL; pp. 1 - 30
Main Authors Löding, Christof, Madhusudan, P., Peña, Lucas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2018
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We give foundational results that explain the efficacy of heuristics used for dealing with quantified formulas and recursive definitions. We develop a framework for first order logic (FOL) over an uninterpreted combination of background theories. Our central technical result is that systematic term instantiation is complete for a fragment of FOL that we call safe . Coupled with the fact that unfolding recursive definitions is essentially term instantiation and with the observation that heap verification engines generate verification conditions in the safe fragment explains the efficacy of verification engines like natural proofs that resort to such heuristics. Furthermore, we study recursive definitions with least fixpoint semantics and show that though they are not amenable to complete procedures, we can systematically introduce induction principles that in practice bridge the divide between FOL and FOL with recursive definitions.
ISSN:2475-1421
2475-1421
DOI:10.1145/3158098