A Longitudinal Study of Two Early Intervention Strategies: Project CARE

65 families with children at risk for cognitive difficulties were randomly assigned at the time of the child's birth to 1 of 3 groups, 2 intervention and 1 control. For the most intensive intervention group, family education was combined with a center-based educational day-care program; the les...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChild development Vol. 61; no. 6; pp. 1682 - 1696
Main Authors Wasik, Barbara Hanna, Ramey, Craig T., Bryant, Donna M., Sparling, Joseph J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, MA University of Chicago Press 01.12.1990
Blackwell
University of Chicago Press for the Society for Research in Child Development, etc
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:65 families with children at risk for cognitive difficulties were randomly assigned at the time of the child's birth to 1 of 3 groups, 2 intervention and 1 control. For the most intensive intervention group, family education was combined with a center-based educational day-care program; the less intensive intervention group received the home-based family education program only. To assess the cognitive performance of children, The Bayley Scales of Infant Development were administered at 6, 12, and 18 months; the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test at 24, 36, and 48 months; and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities at 30, 42, and 54 months. On each test after the 6-month assessment, scores of children in the educational day-care plus family support group were greater than those in the other 2 groups. No cognitive intervention effects were obtained for the family education group. Group effects were not obtained for measures of either the quality of the home environment or parent attention.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-3920
1467-8624
DOI:10.2307/1130831