The Effect of Instance-Space Partition on Significance

This paper demonstrates experimentally that concluding which induction algorithm is more accurate based on the results from one partition of the instances into the cross-validation folds may lead to statistically erroneous conclusions. Comparing two decision tree induction and one naive-bayes induct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMachine learning Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 269 - 286
Main Authors Bradford, Jeffrey P, Brodley, Carla E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Nature B.V 01.03.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper demonstrates experimentally that concluding which induction algorithm is more accurate based on the results from one partition of the instances into the cross-validation folds may lead to statistically erroneous conclusions. Comparing two decision tree induction and one naive-bayes induction algorithms, we find situations in which one algorithm is judged more accurate at the p = 0.05 level with one partition of the training instances but the other algorithm is judged more accurate at the p = 0.05 level with an alternate partition. We recommend a new significance procedure that involves performing cross-validation using multiple instance-space partitions. Significance is determined by applying the paired Student t-test separately to the results from each cross-validation partition, averaging their values, and converting this averaged value into a significance value.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-6125
1573-0565
DOI:10.1023/A:1007613918580