Coping strategies in young people during the COVID-19 pandemic: rapid review

Aims and method To better understand factors supporting young people's (age <18 years) mental health during pandemic-type conditions, we aimed to identify whether coping strategies adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic could be dichotomised according to manifesting positive or negative psycho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBJPsych bulletin pp. 1 - 10
Main Authors Howard, Ranjita, Manohar, Harshini, Seshadri, Shekhar, Sharma, Aditya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge University Press 30.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims and method To better understand factors supporting young people's (age <18 years) mental health during pandemic-type conditions, we aimed to identify whether coping strategies adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic could be dichotomised according to manifesting positive or negative psychological outcomes. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and ASSIA databases were used to identify empirical studies that examined coping strategies used by young people experiencing psychological challenges during COVID-19. Results Twenty-five international studies were included, identifying that coping strategies adopted could be significantly dichotomised according to reducing or exacerbating psychological challenges. Positive coping strategies were proactive and solutions-oriented, whereas negative coping strategies were more avoidant and emotion-oriented. Clinical implications An internal locus of control may account for why adolescents exercised more proactive coping compared with their younger counterparts, although parents of younger children may offset the impact of stressors by drawing on a proposed coping framework emphasising proactivity and engagement. This would be an invaluable addition to future pandemic preparedness planning cycles.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2056-4694
2056-4708
DOI:10.1192/bjb.2024.49